 | | Re: 2 Things... —Frank Filz
|
| | | (...) Another annoying thing, I'm not sure what you're doing to set the text size, but on my Netscape at work, the text now comes out almost too small to read. (25 years ago, 22-Jun-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: 2 Things... —Jeff Stembel
|
| | | | | (...) Are you talking about the text from previous messages? Not only is it too small, it is too light! I have a hard time even seeing it because it blends into the background. The current-message text is still the same size, at least for me. Jeff (25 years ago, 22-Jun-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: 2 Things... —Frank Filz
|
| | | | | | | (...) All the text on the Lugnet home page. (25 years ago, 22-Jun-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: 2 Things... —Jeff Stembel
|
| | | | | | | | | (...) least (...) Oh, your're right, that is small. Not too small on my current settings, but I'm sure a lot of people view it at higher resolutions than I am. Jeff (25 years ago, 22-Jun-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: 2 Things... —Steve Bliss
|
| | | | | | | | (...) Especially the site menu. Steve (25 years ago, 22-Jun-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: 2 Things... —Todd Lehman
|
| | | | | | | | (...) The sub-categories at the top? What browser are you using, what OS, what screen mode, and what monitor size? And do you have Verdana or Arial? --Todd (25 years ago, 22-Jun-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: 2 Things... —Steve Bliss
|
| | | | | | | | (...) Them too. But I meant the Links and Resources menu. (...) IE5, Win98, 1600x1200 (browser *not* maximized), 21". (...) It seems to be coming out Verdana, like it should. Steve (25 years ago, 23-Jun-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: 2 Things... —Todd Lehman
|
| | | | | | (...) You're talking about 2 and 3 messages back, right? 1 message back looks OK? What if 2 & 3 back looked the same as 1 back? It's harder to visualize the flow of the message that way, but maybe it'll be more immediately readable. (...) yeah, that (...) (25 years ago, 22-Jun-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: 2 Things... —Jeff Stembel
|
| | | | | | (...) I think that would be best. I never had any trouble visualizing the message flow anyways. :) Jeff (25 years ago, 22-Jun-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: 2 Things... —Todd Lehman
|
| | | | | | (...) OK, done. --Todd (25 years ago, 22-Jun-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: 2 Things... —Todd Lehman
|
| | | | (...) On the full-article view, it's using <FONT SIZE="-1"> and <FONT SIZE="-2"> for the quoted text and the standard font size for the main text. This might change to use only SIZE="-1". On the brief snippet views, it's using <FONT (...) (25 years ago, 22-Jun-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | |
