 | | Re: Reconstructing second hand LEGO sets
|
| Terry K <legoverse@geocities.com> wrote in message news:376c2064.750670...net.com... (...) This really is a great resourse. I don't know if it's exhaustive, though, even for the years it covers. I seem to recall finding some of these parts in other (...) (25 years ago, 21-Jun-99, to lugnet.general)
| | | | | Re: Reconstructing second hand LEGO sets
|
| (...) No, I don't believe it is exhaustive. And many numbers used (element numbers) have been changed. (...) Good question. James may have had a database, or maybe he just kept track in some simple way. I think Joshua did help him some with that (...) (25 years ago, 21-Jun-99, to lugnet.general)
| | | | | Re: Reconstructing second hand LEGO sets
|
| (...) It's not exhaustive, from any point-of-view. I think James documented the sets he had, for the pieces he could put online. Awhile ago, I created a utility to reformat the data by set. It quickly became apparent there were pieces missing for (...) (25 years ago, 21-Jun-99, to lugnet.general)
| |
