To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.generalOpen lugnet.general in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 General / 45473
45472  |  45474
Subject: 
Re: LEGOFan.net - central community run hub for all areas of the LEGO community.
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.general
Date: 
Sat, 14 Feb 2004 00:57:22 GMT
Viewed: 
3185 times
  
In lugnet.general, Troy Cefaratti wrote:
In lugnet.general, Jindrich Kubec wrote:
Wasn't it told in previous debate about WorldLUG, that Lugnet doesn't
evolve anymore? Not to mention that it's a 'private property'.

Why yes, it was.  By myself, in this post:
http://news.lugnet.com/general/?n=45197

And also in Todds reply:
http://news.lugnet.com/general/?n=45213

Lugnet is a great place.  I like it very much and it has been very good to me
over the years.  It is, however, not going forward.  If it were, then there
would not be a need for anything new or different.

Troy

I had not realize that Todd himself approved of such a situation.  That changes
everything from my point of vue.  I no longer see it the way I did.

However, some people have brought the argument that WorldLUG aims to do a
similar thing.  Maybe the whole community, here on Lugnet, should talk about
achiving something like that before some people try to make their own version of
what WorldLUG was about to do.

I still think the way thiws project was brought to us is the wrong way.  It's
nice to plan to do something, but before saying you want to create a central hub
for this community, I feel you should have talked to us before.  And it kind of
short-circuits the WorldLUG projects, which was meant to be a community open
project, not a few select people's project.

Terry



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: LEGOFan.net - central community run hub for all areas of the LEGO community.
 
(...) Why yes, it was. By myself, in this post: (URL) also in Todds reply: (URL) is a great place. I like it very much and it has been very good to me over the years. It is, however, not going forward. If it were, then there would not be a need for (...) (21 years ago, 12-Feb-04, to lugnet.general)  

208 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR