Subject:
|
Re: Petition against permanent color changes
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.general
|
Date:
|
Thu, 20 Nov 2003 20:27:33 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2343 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.general, Mike Petrucelli wrote:
| |
If your only complaint is the quality of cohesion then this is no longer a
real issue with Mega Bloks. If you are insistent on LEGO brand just for the
sake of the name than I respect that.
|
It’s brand loyality and 30+ years of doing business with LEGO (never a dark
age). I still hear stories from many friends who have had troubles with MB. So
I figure “Why spend my money on something people say is starting to work when
I’ve been using a product that has and continues to work for me for over 30
years?”
Adr.
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: Petition against permanent color changes
|
| (...) If I may be permitted to speak on the issue of clone brands, I offer the following: You pose a valid question, and it actually describes something quite distinct from (and better than) pure brand loyalty, which can be self-defeating. Your (...) (21 years ago, 20-Nov-03, to lugnet.general, FTX)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Petition against permanent color changes
|
| (...) Please see (URL) here> If your only complaint is the quality of cohesion then this is no longer a real issue with Mega Bloks. If you are insistent on LEGO brand just for the sake of the name than I respect that. For the record I do not mix the (...) (21 years ago, 20-Nov-03, to lugnet.general, FTX)
|
103 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
