| |
I bollixed up how I describe this...
In lugnet.general, Larry Pieniazek wrote:
> Here's 2001's list
>
> http://news.lugnet.com/people/?n=1396
(meaning: this is the list that gives the stats for 2000)
>
> and here's 2002's list
>
> http://news.lugnet.com/people/?n=3410
(meaning: this is the list that gives the stats for 2001)
>
> These are both part of the same large thread and take a while to load.
>
> I am not sure where 2000's
(meaning: the list that gives the stats for 1999, the one that Tim Courtney was
referring to in the post that caused Todd to generate post 1396)
> list is, anyone know?
I'm also not sure where 2003's list is either (meaning: the list that gives
stats for 2002).. there is no 2004 list yet because 2003 isn't over, so get
talking everyone, I tire of being first.
|
|
Message has 3 Replies:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: top poster statistics
|
| (...) Nope. But I know how to look for stuff, a valuable skill to cultivate here. The search box is your friend. start here: (URL) get reminded that the list is called "top 1000 noisemakers" which is a singularly un-useful name for it as it's not (...) (23 years ago, 30-Oct-03, to lugnet.general, lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
12 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
