Subject:
|
Re: top poster statistics
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.people
|
Date:
|
Thu, 30 Oct 2003 17:33:19 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2748 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.people, David Koudys wrote:
> In lugnet.general, Rob Hendrix wrote:
> > > I'm also not sure where 2003's list is either (meaning: the list that gives
> > > stats for 2002).. there is no 2004 list yet because 2003 isn't over, so get
> > > talking everyone, I tire of being first.
I had all the news articles in the thread in a linear view.
I seen this near the bottom:
http://news.lugnet.com/people/?n=3436
It shows 2001 and 2002 postings and the differential.
I hope that helps.
Ben M.
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: top poster statistics
|
| (...) That list used incorrect values since Dan posted two versions of the 2001 list. Here's the correct one: (URL) Best regards, /Tobbe (URL) (remove SPAM when e-mailing) (21 years ago, 31-Oct-03, to lugnet.people)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: top poster statistics
|
| (...) I know you spoke in jest, but actually, out of most of the 'heavy posters' (including yours truly), I find Larry's posts, for the most part, to be helpful and a good guide pointing in the right direction. Anywho, that's just what I noticed. (...) (21 years ago, 30-Oct-03, to lugnet.people)
|
12 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
