 | | Re: top poster statistics
|
|
(...) Nope. But I know how to look for stuff, a valuable skill to cultivate here. The search box is your friend. start here: (URL) get reminded that the list is called "top 1000 noisemakers" which is a singularly un-useful name for it as it's not (...) (21 years ago, 30-Oct-03, to lugnet.general, lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| |
| | Re: top poster statistics
|
|
I bollixed up how I describe this... (...) (meaning: the list that gives the stats for 1999, the one that Tim Courtney was referring to in the post that caused Todd to generate post 1396) (...) I'm also not sure where 2003's list is either (meaning: (...) (21 years ago, 30-Oct-03, to lugnet.general, lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| |
| | Re: top poster statistics
|
|
(...) gives (...) get (...) Not a prestigious title by any means, but it does prove that you are full of hot air and long winded! ;-P -The one who modz the bricks (21 years ago, 30-Oct-03, to lugnet.general, lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| |
| | Re: top poster statistics
|
|
In lugnet.general, Larry Pieniazek wrote: <snip> (...) On it ++Lar... ;) Dave K (21 years ago, 30-Oct-03, to lugnet.general, lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| |
| | Re: top poster statistics
|
|
(...) I know you spoke in jest, but actually, out of most of the 'heavy posters' (including yours truly), I find Larry's posts, for the most part, to be helpful and a good guide pointing in the right direction. Anywho, that's just what I noticed. (...) (21 years ago, 30-Oct-03, to lugnet.people)
|
| |
| | Re: top poster statistics
|
|
(...) I had all the news articles in the thread in a linear view. I seen this near the bottom: (URL) shows 2001 and 2002 postings and the differential. I hope that helps. Ben M. (21 years ago, 30-Oct-03, to lugnet.people)
|
| |
| | Re: top poster statistics
|
|
Thanks, I should of thought of searching using the word frequency but I would never have thought of noisemakers as a search term tim (21 years ago, 30-Oct-03, to lugnet.general, lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| |
| | Re: top poster statistics
|
|
(...) I'll second that, mind you how do you find time to do any Lego-ing, I know I spend far too much of my available time on Lugnet and I'm not on it nearly as much as you seem be (Lar) Tim (21 years ago, 30-Oct-03, to lugnet.people)
|
| |
| | Re: top poster statistics
|
|
(...) This is the list for 2003 (meaning: the list that gives stats for 2002) timj (21 years ago, 30-Oct-03, to lugnet.general, lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| |
| | Re: top poster statistics
|
|
(...) That list used incorrect values since Dan posted two versions of the 2001 list. Here's the correct one: (URL) Best regards, /Tobbe (URL) (remove SPAM when e-mailing) (21 years ago, 31-Oct-03, to lugnet.people)
|
