|
|
 | | Re: The way we were: January, 1994
|
| (...) Probably Google. Here's an interesting page, regarding old usenet messages: (URL) can search all the way back to May 12, 1981. (The entire collection, not rtl) (URL)Anyway...just thought this topic list from r.t.l might be entertaining. (...) (...) (22 years ago, 27-May-03, to lugnet.general)
| | | | | Re: LUGNET logo products at CafePress
|
| In lugnet.general, Suzanne D. Rich writes: <SNIP> (...) Hi Suzanne, Are you the same Suzanne as in the address here above? I would like to know. I and a college would like to be a Lugnet member and would send our $10 with the mail from Europe. I (...) (22 years ago, 27-May-03, to lugnet.general)
| | | | | Re: The way we were: January, 1994
|
| (...) FYI, I did something like that for a short while in 1996. So it's more a sorted and annoteted snapshot than a history. See the 'Quotes' section of LEGO on my Mind, (URL) like your idea though. The good thing is, thanks to the internet's 'own (...) (22 years ago, 27-May-03, to lugnet.general)
| | | | | Re: *NEW* LEGO brick-ish Transformers by Hasbro -- What's the deal?
|
| (...) It's not a question of whether they're actual Lego products, as we know they're not. Andrew's question was 'why didn't Lego do these?' I'll admit, some people are probably confused by shoddy headlines ((URL) , halfway down the front page, "In (...) (22 years ago, 27-May-03, to lugnet.general, lugnet.lego)
| | | | | Re: *NEW* LEGO brick-ish Transformers by Hasbro: BTR line
|
| (...) Aaron, Yes, I did LOOK at tformers.com before posting this. No where in my post did I say that these were official LEGO Transformers. I quoted a line from an article headline that I read that led me to the catalogue scans. I did not quote (...) (22 years ago, 27-May-03, to lugnet.general, lugnet.lego)
|
|
