| | Re: Rules for April Fool's Day (was: Strange Find on Lego.com)
|
|
(...) this one: lame or copycat hoaxes need not apply. Personally, I feel that April Fool's has gotten a bit out of hand around here. It seems that everybody and his dog have a hoax to spring, and some of them aren't all that good. We've all seen (...) (22 years ago, 3-Apr-03, to lugnet.general)
|
|
| | Re: Rules for April Fool's Day (was: Strange Find on Lego.com)
|
|
"Rules" for April Fools Day? I had to check the date on the post to see if the poster was serious or not. :-) I'm not sure you can promulgate rules or have them stick. (22 years ago, 3-Apr-03, to lugnet.general)
|
|
| | Re: Rules for April Fool's Day (was: Strange Find on Lego.com)
|
|
(...) I agree with Larry. There's no way to ensure that everybody reading next year's April fool's hoax will have read the rules so the hoax planners can't assume the same thing won't happen again. Every April fool's hoax makes the community on the (...) (22 years ago, 3-Apr-03, to lugnet.general)
|
|
| | Re: Rules for April Fool's Day (was: Strange Find on Lego.com)
|
|
Well, ja know what? Me and Chris had fun with it before some people ruined it. And it was thin yes, but it was thrown together in 15 mins--so what do you expect? And if you dont like it, then ignore it. Is it that hard to do?? The classic April (...) (22 years ago, 3-Apr-03, to lugnet.general)
|
|
| | Re: Rules for April Fool's Day (was: Strange Find on Lego.com)
|
|
(...) for the fact that it's been done so many times before. If you threw it together in 15 minutes, then why get so upset about the fact that it fell apart in five? Relax, share a good laugh, and try something more original next year. - Chris. (22 years ago, 3-Apr-03, to lugnet.general)
|
|
| | Re: Rules for April Fool's Day (was: Strange Find on Lego.com)
|
|
(...) "Rules? We don't need no skeeking rules." (...) And for some people, part of the fun of April 1 is pointing out that the Emperor is unclothed. :) James (22 years ago, 3-Apr-03, to lugnet.general)
|