Subject:
|
Re: Rock Raiders --Wider is not better.
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.general
|
Date:
|
Fri, 14 May 1999 08:22:54 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
602 times
|
| |
|
|
----------
In article <373B996A.DC39C5E4@ix.netcom.com>, Allen Carley
<acarley@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>
> Hello again,
>
> Every once in a while I break out of lurk to post and Rock Raiders
> set 4970, Chrome Crusher, was the inspiration this time.
>
> As is usual in my reviews, I break out the good, the bad, and the
> ugly. So here goes.
>
> The Good: Lots of spunk in the little mini-figure. I like the new
> helmet. I like his insane look. I like the worn tough look of the
> set in general. Rock Raiders are the dwarves of Legoland (or
> System if you like), living underground, mining, singing, and just
> being tough.
You forgot about 'speaking in a hokey Australian accent' (as in the movie
'Alien From LA').
While you might want to pass on 4970, check out the two smallest sets, they
are pretty decent.
Rob
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Rock Raiders --Wider is not better.
|
| I actually did pick up the smallest sets as well and I'd agree. The 4910 is a standard little set. I think it is because they couldn't fit any Jr. into a set that small. But with the strange shaped base and the roof pieces, it is the most non-blocky (...) (25 years ago, 14-May-99, to lugnet.general)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Rock Raiders --Wider is not better.
|
| Hello again, Every once in a while I break out of lurk to post and Rock Raiders set 4970, Chrome Crusher, was the inspiration this time. As is usual in my reviews, I break out the good, the bad, and the ugly. So here goes. The Good: Lots of spunk (...) (25 years ago, 14-May-99, to lugnet.general)
|
4 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
