 | | Re: Corrections to LUGNET Sets Database. —Joshua Delahunty
|
| | | (...) Note that they list "+1967", short-hand for "1967 is the earliest reference we currently have. I'm glad you noticed them. You're much more expert than I am to comment on the release date. The "+" is specifically there to make it stand out and (...) (26 years ago, 6-May-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Corrections to LUGNET Sets Database. —Gary R. Istok
|
| | | | (...) Thanks for the reply Joshua (and thanks especially for all the work in keeping the databases updated!). The next thread will go to lugnet.admin.database. I studied that page (from the supposed 1961 Samsonite Catalog) on the website. I assume (...) (26 years ago, 6-May-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Corrections to LUGNET Sets Database. —Joshua Delahunty
|
| | | | [Followups to lugnet.admin.database] Gary, did you ever manage to check the mint-condition copy of this scan? -- joshua (...) (26 years ago, 22-May-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | |
