 | | Anyone notice something wrong with "Lego Battleship 2001" on the latest lego magazine? —Evan Butzlaff
|
| | | Well, looky here. This "Lego Battleship 2001" is not really lego. It's megabloks. Oh yeah, what a great creation, a megabloks ship with a few lego pieces thrown on it. Why, may I ask, does lego feature its competition in it's magazines? A very (...) (22 years ago, 12-Nov-02, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Anyone notice something wrong with "Lego Battleship 2001" on the latest lego magazine? —Harvey Henkelman
|
| | | | (...) That just goes to show how much LEGO® actually pays attention and cares about the subject matter. -Harvey 'chuggin down a can of Coca-Cola in a Pepsi ad' (22 years ago, 13-Nov-02, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Anyone notice something wrong with "Lego Battleship 2001" on the latest lego magazine? —Evan Butzlaff
|
| | | | (...) Lol. Yeah, I suppose Lego really doesn't care much at all. Anyone else have any comments? ~Evan Butzlaff (22 years ago, 14-Nov-02, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Anyone notice something wrong with "Lego Battleship 2001" on the latest lego magazine? —Kevin Wilson
|
| | | | Evan Butzlaff wrote in message ... (...) It's happened before, multiple times. Try posting in lego-direct, or email Jake McKee directly. He knows who to refer this kind of thing to, to get it fixed. Kevin ---...--- NEW Cottage kit, 577 pieces! (URL) (...) (22 years ago, 16-Nov-02, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | |
