| | Re: Brickshelf censorship policy rules..... Ken Koleda
|
| | I'm a little confused here. In what way is that picture of a woman in a lego t-shirt a 'sex' picture? Yikes, is this what it's coming too? The lunatic fringe? Kevin, I do not envy you your task. But I do appreciate your effort. Ken (...) - (...) (22 years ago, 3-Sep-02, to lugnet.general)
|
| | |
| | | | Re: Brickshelf censorship policy rules..... Nathan Schroeder
|
| | | | (...) Ummmm....How can we even be sure that is a woman? It could be a man with a medical condition. I know a guy like that... (22 years ago, 3-Sep-02, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | |
| | | | Re: Brickshelf censorship policy rules..... John Neal
|
| | | | (...) ??? Um, *not* a picture of a woman, but a picture of a woman's *chest*. Think to yourself: Would Kevin have censored it if the woman's head were included in the picture? Would Kevin have censored it if the picture were focused entirely upon (...) (22 years ago, 3-Sep-02, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Brickshelf censorship policy rules..... Pedro Silva
|
| | | | | (...) I do see the T-shirt, not the chest. (...) Or maybe a fertile immagination? (...) Or reality? Is it possible that you might have found something central in the pic, that was probably not? I mean, I actually found it funny: what is "seen" in (...) (22 years ago, 3-Sep-02, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Brickshelf censorship policy rules..... Richard Marchetti
|
| | | | (...) This is a REALLY funny thread. I can barely figure out what people are arguing for or against any longer... BTW, this image was not removed -- if it had been, we wouldn't all be able to see it for ourselves and pass our own stupid judgments (...) (22 years ago, 4-Sep-02, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | |