 | | Re: They took away my LUGNET
|
|
NNTP? -Rob "James J. Trobaugh" <james@ngltc.org> wrote in message news:GyC2up.38r@lugnet.com... (...) LUGNET (...) company's (...) servers (...) he (...) figure (...) (22 years ago, 27-Jun-02, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: They took away my LUGNET
|
|
Nope, they fully restrict almost all ports that would allow me to connect via NNTP, I can't even FTP, or connect to my MAIL server directly (i have to use sites like WEB2MAIL.com to get my personal email) There is also a rule in the guidelines that (...) (22 years ago, 27-Jun-02, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: They took away my LUGNET
|
|
Well you could always get someone to print out messages and fax them over! ;) "James J. Trobaugh" <james@ngltc.org> wrote in message news:GyC9C9.JK5@lugnet.com... (...) to (...) awful. (...) I (...) that (...) I (...) (22 years ago, 27-Jun-02, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: They took away my LUGNET
|
|
Great idea, I'll send you my fax number :D (...) (22 years ago, 27-Jun-02, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: They took away my LUGNET
|
|
(...) Too bad about NNTP. Did you try all of the alternate ports like 8000 and 8080 and whatever the rest of them are? It is probably not a bandwidth issue but more of a lost-time issue. Labor is pretty expensive (offices, equipment, supplies, (...) (22 years ago, 27-Jun-02, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: They took away my LUGNET
|
|
"Kevin Salm" <kdsalm@dreamscape.com> wrote in message news:GyCv1o.Ktr@lugnet.com... (...) taking (...) email (...) year. (...) environments (...) with (...) I agree, I suspect that inefficiency is caused by the person and not they kind of they have (...) (22 years ago, 27-Jun-02, to lugnet.general)
|
