Subject:
|
Re: Got Info? (Set 1589)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.general
|
Date:
|
Wed, 14 Apr 1999 19:42:18 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
829 times
|
| |
![Post a public reply to this message](/news/icon-reply.gif) | |
Joshua Delahunty wrote:
> Was "Main Street" the name on the box?
I haven't got the box - Richard Dewsbury has the most complete version
to my knowledge. I didn't even know the set number until Richard posted
to RTL - my instructions are badly damaged - the 89 was torn off.
I wouldn't have thought the box would have a name though - the Weetabix
box might have though - I don't think anyone would have kept it.
--
Carbon 60
ICQ # 5643170
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
![](/news/x.gif) | | Re: Got Info? (Set 1589)
|
| (...) Yes, last November-ish. The piece count was never discussed or disclosed. I took the 1978 from that discussion, hand-counted to get the current element-count guess; and I even guessed that they were your scans on Kevin's site, after reading (...) (25 years ago, 14-Apr-99, to lugnet.general)
|
5 Messages in This Thread: ![Got Info? (Set 1589) -Joshua Delahunty (12-Apr-99 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: Got Info? (Set 1589) -Jeff Stembel (12-Apr-99 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: Got Info? (Set 1589) -Simon Denscombe (13-Apr-99 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Got Info? (Set 1589) -Joshua Delahunty (14-Apr-99 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![You are here](/news/here.gif)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|