Subject:
|
Re: Profitable year for LEGO?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.general
|
Date:
|
Thu, 21 Mar 2002 10:35:38 GMT
|
Highlighted:
|
(details)
|
Viewed:
|
821 times
|
| |
|
|
"Kevin McMillin" <mcmillins@prodigy.net> wrote in message
news:GtAnqB.8uz@lugnet.com...
> Hi all,
>
> The Financial Times has a short article saying that Harry Potter and • Bob the
> Builder helped boost LEGO into a profitable 2001.
>
> The full article can be found at:
http://news.ft.com/ft/gx.cgi/ftc?pagename=View&c=Article&cid=FT3GK1250ZC
&live=true&tagid=ZZZB2FVYA0C&subheading=consumer%20industries
>
> This seems to be good news!
I see it as bad news for old-timers like me.
Their success seems to have come at the expense of the Lego values that
I hold dear, and as a consequence seems only likely to take Lego even
further away from what I would like so see, and more towards endless
- movie themes
- juniorisation
- theme specific parts
- collectables
And don't try to tell me about bulk bricks. 18 months on and it seems
there are less bulk bricks available now than when it started.
lawrence
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Profitable year for LEGO?
|
| Hi all, The Financial Times has a short article saying that Harry Potter and Bob the Builder helped boost LEGO into a profitable 2001. The full article can be found at: (URL) seems to be good news! Kevin (23 years ago, 20-Mar-02, to lugnet.general) !
|
4 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
