Subject:
|
Re: Profitable year for LEGO?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.general
|
Date:
|
Thu, 21 Mar 2002 09:13:38 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
423 times
|
| |
|
|
I assume they mean Building blocks as opposed to clothes, watches ,bionicle
(only joking on the last one :) ).
Although we may argue the lack of traditional blocks in modern lines - town
jr, Harry Potter or Alpha Team - , they are still essentially traditional
LEGO construction sets containing building blocks (albeit specialist ones).
At least in the FT's and LEGO's eyes, even if not in ours :)
I can't see they meant the upturn in profits was due to Freestyle boxes and
bulk bricks.
--
James Stacey
---------
www.minifig.co.uk
#925 - I'm a citizen of Legoland travelling Incommunicado
>
> I found this line to be interesting:
>
> "Lego's traditional products such as building blocks "contributed
> handsomely" to the year's result..."
>
> I wonder where they sold all these 'building blocks'? Not in my
> neighbourhood. Sigh. Well there's always next year. :(
>
> I hate to sound like a broken record, but nothing they sold last year • looked
> or felt much like their 'traditional products'. Though the recent Super
> Chief and Blacksmith Shop give me great hope.
>
> Regards,
> Allan B.
> - Expert Builder website
> - http://www.apotome.com/builder
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Profitable year for LEGO?
|
| (...) I found this line to be interesting: "Lego's traditional products such as building blocks "contributed handsomely" to the year's result..." I wonder where they sold all these 'building blocks'? Not in my neighbourhood. Sigh. Well there's (...) (22 years ago, 21-Mar-02, to lugnet.general)
|
4 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
