Subject:
|
Re: Brickshelf L.L.C.
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.general
|
Date:
|
Fri, 22 Feb 2002 17:12:34 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1763 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.general, Torsten Fresemann writes:
> In lugnet.general, Kevin Loch writes:
> [...]
> > A related concequence is that the Instruction and Catalog scan library had to
> > be taken offline. This was necessary because the Company had not yet received
> > permission from LEGO to use them on a commercial site, and to reduce bandwidth
> > costs. I sincerely hope that a workable business solution can be found for
> > those two issues.
> That's a great shame. However, please confirm you are not actually planning
> on charging fees for downloading scans provided by many Lego fans around the
> world?
Contrast with GPL. The fee charged would not be for the information itself,
but rather for the access to it ("duplication cost")...
> The suggestion that people pay for their galleries is quite a
> feasible one, though, I guess.
Not at 5 a month each it isn't, I don't think. That may be a bit high for
the market.
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Brickshelf L.L.C.
|
| In lugnet.general, Kevin Loch writes: [...] (...) That's a great shame. However, please confirm you are not actually planning on charging fees for downloading scans provided by many Lego fans around the world? The suggestion that people pay for (...) (23 years ago, 22-Feb-02, to lugnet.general)
|
48 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
