 | | Questionable content on Brickshelf —Tamyra Teed
|
| | | I'm not sure where to post this, so I'm going to put it in General for now.. please set FUT's to an appropriate group. First let me say this.. I'm not a prude, I feel most people have the right to view what they wish. Though when viewing Lego (...) (23 years ago, 24-Jan-02, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Questionable content on Brickshelf —Richard Noeckel
|
| | | | | C’mon I really don’t think it t’was intentional? Anyway, why be so Victorianly insecure… It’s the Human form, its natural, and its not depicted in a salacious manner! Conversely, It probably won’t show up again. So don’t worry… -R P.S. don’t you (...) (23 years ago, 24-Jan-02, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Questionable content on Brickshelf —Thomas Avery
|
| | | | | (...) Well, that's not too bad. Sometimes odd things just get in the way when taking pictures and we don't realize it. This is a good example: (URL) you can edit out red-eye from a photo, but what do you do with brown-eye? TJ (23 years ago, 24-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Questionable content on Brickshelf —Tanya K. Burkhart
|
| | | | | | (...) EEEEWWWWW! That's definately one for cropping in Photoshop! :P Tanya (23 years ago, 24-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Questionable content on Brickshelf —Robert Graff
|
| | | | | Well, I don't think this a case of bad taste. The folder is named "Sonstiges" and the subfolder is named "Dies und Das"; which is German for "Other\This and that". Based on the file names, I would syt the pictures appear to photographs of the guy's (...) (23 years ago, 24-Jan-02, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Questionable content on Brickshelf —Dave Schuler
|
| | | | | | | (...) I think it's a far greater crime that he has a box cutter carelessly thrown onto an assembled 6970. Dave! (23 years ago, 24-Jan-02, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Questionable content on Brickshelf —Christopher Tracey
|
| | | | | | (...) Given that the piece does not look finished yet (and may be sitting sideways on the easle) and that there are at least three more canvases in the shot I think this piece can be safely left alone. (...) I probably would have never noticed the (...) (23 years ago, 24-Jan-02, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Questionable content on Brickshelf —Adam Murtha
|
| | | | | I think that this shouldn't be a big deal. Like Richard said, it's art, and the human form. Nothing evil or malicious about it. And as far as I know, the owner of this picture did not post any direct links to this picture saying "Come look at this!" (...) (23 years ago, 24-Jan-02, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Questionable content on Brickshelf —Mark Neumann
|
| | | | | You know I'll bet dollars to donuts that this person didn't even realize that the painting was in the photo. If it really irritates you I'd try getting the e-mail of Matthias Lausch from Brickbay and writing him to see if he would take care of the (...) (23 years ago, 24-Jan-02, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Questionable content on Brickshelf —Tom Reed
|
| | | | (...) I find it funny that whenever someone objects to something, they unwillingly bring a whole lot more attention to it then it would have drawn under normal circumstances! Kind of defeats the purpose in some instances! I respect Tamyra's personal (...) (23 years ago, 25-Jan-02, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | |
