 | | Re: Expert Builder website - Great response results in first update —Jude Beaudin
|
| | | (...) not reflect your apparent theme of 'Classic LEGO good, Current LEGO bad'? Jude (23 years ago, 8-Jan-02, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Expert Builder website - Great response results in first update —Allan Bedford
|
| | | | (...) I'm saying I can't speak until I read the letter. After all that's gone on in this thread tonight, this is as honest as I can be with you. I've also clearly and publically stated that the site is an autocracy, not a democracy. It's rule by (...) (23 years ago, 8-Jan-02, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Expert Builder website - Great response results in first update —Jude Beaudin
|
| | | | (...) I do not see your opinions being expressed as souring LUGNET. Now if you carry them into a flamewar then then I could see it. Although I do find it strange that you want to advertise the alternate opinions that you want to take away from (...) (23 years ago, 8-Jan-02, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Expert Builder website - Great response results in first update —Allan Bedford
|
| | | | (...) I don't see this thread as a flamewar... at least I hope it's not becoming that. I'm trying to respond to everyone's concerns over this 'column' incident by reminding people that they are already participating in a site that generally embraces (...) (23 years ago, 8-Jan-02, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Expert Builder website - Great response results in first update —Richie Dulin
|
| | | | In lugnet.general, Allan Bedford writes: [snip] (...) Worse in what way? The criticism isn't of your comments on the columns isn't that you said (paraphrasing) "the column is bad", it's that you said (again paraphrasing) "the column could be (...) (23 years ago, 8-Jan-02, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | |
