 | | Re: The Mutant Calamari —Mark Sandlin
|
| | | (...) I like the bendy-arm solution, but I think the old 4x10 canopy is fairly tired. The boxy shape doesn't do much for me either. What if you combined your bendy arms with the new canopies? ~Grand Admiral Muffin Head (23 years ago, 11-Dec-01, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: The Mutant Calamari —Lindsay Frederick Braun
|
| | | | (...) I'm in agreement here, really--you can close up the new "clamshell" pretty easily, with black 1x6 pieces available in the other $10 sub. I think that the "rounded" nature of the canopy would lend really well to the redesign of the arm section. (...) (23 years ago, 11-Dec-01, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: The Mutant Calamari —Richard Marchetti
|
| | | | (...) It looks good. Although I haven't yet seen the new black sub parts that would close up the sides. I find the new canopies are a little stunted looking, so no matter what I think one needs to extend the middle area. The angles of the new (...) (23 years ago, 11-Dec-01, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: The Mutant Calamari —Lindsay Frederick Braun
|
| | | | (...) You can also use 3x3 angle bricks to "space out" the shells, if need be! The big advantage, it seems, is in the ability to make "rounder" (or more octagonal?) flattened shapes. (...) Sure they could--they just couldn't be articulated *right* (...) (23 years ago, 11-Dec-01, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: The Mutant Calamari —Lindsay Frederick Braun
|
| | | | Sorry, self-correction: (...) This still wouldn't allow you to use the claws, of course, unless you were really willing to have a LONG unarticulated section (to use the 3L friction peg double to axle-holder). (...) not black, dark grey. Ooops! best (...) (23 years ago, 11-Dec-01, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | |
