 | | Re: Markets and juniorization —John Neal
|
| | | (...) Not for a nanosecond. Because there are literary 1,000,000s of them (little people) and only 1,000s of us (AFOLs). You do the math. (...) TLC is a business. They just want a *market*. They aren't juniorizing just to be daft-- it is what the (...) (23 years ago, 5-Dec-01, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Markets and juniorization —Bradley Dale
|
| | | | (...) that (...) But what if tens of millions of big people wanted to build with LEGO, because TLC was focused on selling it to adults instead of kids? (23 years ago, 6-Dec-01, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Markets and juniorization —John Neal
|
| | | | | (...) You are kidding, right? Maybe in some AFOL fantasy dreamworld place, but not here in good ol' reality. -John (23 years ago, 6-Dec-01, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Markets and juniorization —Frank Filz
|
| | | | (...) If you look at all modeling hobbies in total, which is probably a good approximation of the best total market for any one modeling hobby, I think you would find that that total is smaller than TLC's market. Frank (23 years ago, 6-Dec-01, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Markets and juniorization —Erik Olson
|
| | | | Yeah, but what if a certain Brick company had sets that made adults think "Wow, if I were a kid, I'd want that." They would be so cool, thousands of adults would start collecting them. When Playboy reviews the Sopwith Camel next to the flat-screen (...) (23 years ago, 6-Dec-01, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Markets and juniorization —John P. Henderson
|
| | | | (...) Again, this line of thinking is very much a dream (See my post elsewhere in this thread). However, I might point out that the Lego setups were a HUGE draw at events like the Greenburg Train show where NELUG setup a table or two amongst (...) (23 years ago, 6-Dec-01, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | |
