To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.generalOpen lugnet.general in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 General / 33817
33816  |  33818
Subject: 
Posting
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.castle, lugnet.general
Followup-To: 
lugnet.general
Date: 
Fri, 2 Nov 2001 04:52:45 GMT
Viewed: 
91 times
  
Ok - I usually don't read general posts, but this one really got me thinking
more about what has been on my while for the past few months:

http://news.lugnet.com/general/?n=33776

So my question is - where does one draw the line on posts and replies?
What is actually beneficial vs. just noise ... ?  I personally have adopted
the following philosophy:

1)  Post whenever I have a new creation.
2)  Reply to a newcomer who just posted for the first time.
3)  Post to answer a question - only if I get to it 1st though :)
4)  Reply to someone else's creation - only if I can offer specific comments
about what I liked or what I would like to see in the future.
5)  I just have more time than usual and devote extra time looking at
someone else's creation, thereby bringing me back to # 4.

Very often, I will just highlight someone's creation as a non-verbal stamp
of admiration.  If I don't reply, it very often means that what I thought
about the issue has already been said, and I don't want to come across
as redundant.

Also, if I think that my post won't be productive to the overall "good", i.e.
the amount of bandwith wasted will exceed the good that everyone will
get out of it, I simply don't post.  The utilitarian approach I suppose.

But I want to hear what others think about the issue - when does one post
and when does one hold off?  Because I'm a member, I don't deal with the
e-mail reply problem, and I understand that this might keep others from
posting.  But what else?

I feel that this issue might have been beaten around the bush, but never
taken head-on.  Or maybe it has, and I missed it - a reference to past
articles in that case would be greatly appreciated.

Very curious,

-- Pawel

http://web.utk.edu/~pnazarew/new/



Message has 3 Replies:
  Re: Posting
 
(...) [...] (...) Speaking as someone who has posted MOC's and seen little if any response, I would say - Reply. Even if it's just "Wow, that's pretty cool" it makes a difference. Simply highlighting/spotlighting the message isn't always obvious to (...) (23 years ago, 2-Nov-01, to lugnet.castle, lugnet.general)
  Re: Posting
 
(...) Hi, These are pretty much the same rules I follow when deciding to post, and you have worded them very well. Perhaps if you want to register your approval of a MOC and not waste bandwidth, you could add another step: 4.5) email a personal (...) (23 years ago, 2-Nov-01, to lugnet.general)
  Re: Posting
 
Very interesting question. Personally, my own habits are fairly close to those you listed. Although, I have to admit to highlighting posts when I'm really busy. I actually was never bothered by one line "that's cool" posts, and wouldn't have thought (...) (23 years ago, 3-Nov-01, to lugnet.general)

5 Messages in This Thread:



Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR