Subject:
|
Re: 'Stubbies' © Richard & (maybe) Matthew
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.fun, lugnet.general
|
Date:
|
Tue, 30 Oct 2001 19:34:02 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
94 times
|
| |
|
|
<cough thief cough>
O.K. fine, you can have the term ‘Stubbies’ ©
But the term ‘Stubby’ is MINE! [TM, ©, ® etc.]
You can receive the royalties for the plural, and I'll
accept the profits for the singular term… sounds fair?
I won’t forget this, you –shafted- me BIG TIME!
I was well on my was towards “The Lego Hall of Fame”
And becomin’ indelibly immortalized in the history of AFOL.
[1] Plottin’ revenge,
--==Richard==--
Foot Note:
[1] Revenge; the kind that involves rabid Monkeys…
P.S. Why are these posts being directed to .fun???
This is a serious matter… I'm talkin’ to my lawyer right now!
He said that my initial usage and precedence entitles me to
Inclusionary validation. He sites the landmark case of
‘Bricken vs. Blocken.’ Where the said defendant, Mr. Blocken
stole the Bricken term to coin the phrase ‘Brick.’ The suit ended
when the crooked Mr. Blocken had to pay 50% of his earnings to
the innocent Mr. Bricken.
[This is a true story, based upon the events of my great uncle]
(The names have been changed to protect the innocent)
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
5 Messages in This Thread:
   
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
