 | | LEGO Purity test. was: Super Tanker and Tug Boat at Joe's Lego Page —John Cromer
|
| | | (...) Back in 1996, Kevin John Stefan posted a LEGO Purity Test to RTL. Herewith, I reproduce it as posted: ---...--- Begin included posting from Kevin ---...--- Recently, I've been doing some major-league surfing on the Web (when Netscape isn't (...) (26 years ago, 15-Mar-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: LEGO Purity test. was: Super Tanker and Tug Boat at Joe's Lego Page —Terry Keller
|
| | | | | On Mon, 15 Mar 1999 22:50:56 GMT, "John Cromer" <cro@astro.caltech.edu> wrote: <quoted test snipped> (...) That was fun. And I just went to Dejanews to read the whole thread on David Roth. What a load of crap _that_ was. :-) -- Terry K -- (26 years ago, 16-Mar-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: LEGO Purity test. was: Super Tanker and Tug Boat at Joe's Lego Page —Steve Bliss
|
| | | | | | (...) It was distressing, at the time. But it was much more lighthearted than the whole Mandroid thing. Or Minx's departure. In one way, it's funny to think a lot of people (myself included) were willing to believe that some kid built a 20-foot long (...) (26 years ago, 16-Mar-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: LEGO Purity test. was: Super Tanker and Tug Boat at Joe's Lego Page —Jeremy H. Sproat
|
| | | | | | Wow, what a bunch of skeletons in that closet. A very interesting read on both patron m. and patron r. -- I enjoy viewing a train accident as much as anyone else, I guess. It's funny that I always passed over those threads before. I do remember (...) (26 years ago, 16-Mar-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: LEGO Purity test. was: Super Tanker and Tug Boat at Joe's Lego Page —Tim Courtney
|
| | | | | | (...) I remember her too, but am vague on the departure. Maybe I missed that when I wasn't reading RTL for some time (still aren't), what happened? Keep Building!! -Tim <>< (URL) timcourtne ICQ: 23951114 New Lugnet Newsgroup? (...) (26 years ago, 17-Mar-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: LEGO Purity test. was: Super Tanker and Tug Boat at Joe's Lego Page —Jeff Stembel
|
| | | | | (...) I've never taken one of these before, so I was wondering if you are more "Lego Pure" the lower the percentage. For reference, I got a 35% (If I did it correctly) Jeff (26 years ago, 16-Mar-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: LEGO Purity test. was: Super Tanker and Tug Boat at Joe's Lego Page —Bram Lambrecht
|
| | | | | | (...) You may have made the same mistake I made - It says to total up the *no* answers and divide by 112. If you just kept track of the number you answered *yes*, then subtract that from 112 before you divide. I got a 48% pure. --Bram Bram Lambrecht (...) (26 years ago, 16-Mar-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: LEGO Purity test. was: Super Tanker and Tug Boat at Joe's Lego Page —Jeff Stembel
|
| | | | | | (...) Sounds like I did it correctly, but I'm still wondering if a Lower percentage is more or less pure. :) Jeff (26 years ago, 17-Mar-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: LEGO Purity test. was: Super Tanker and Tug Boat at Joe's Lego Page —Steve Bliss
|
| | | | My favorite: (...) Steve (26 years ago, 16-Mar-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | |
