To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.generalOpen lugnet.general in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 General / 3262
  LEGO Purity test. was: Super Tanker and Tug Boat at Joe's Lego Page
 
(...) Back in 1996, Kevin John Stefan posted a LEGO Purity Test to RTL. Herewith, I reproduce it as posted: ---...--- Begin included posting from Kevin ---...--- Recently, I've been doing some major-league surfing on the Web (when Netscape isn't (...) (25 years ago, 15-Mar-99, to lugnet.general)
 
  Re: LEGO Purity test. was: Super Tanker and Tug Boat at Joe's Lego Page
 
On Mon, 15 Mar 1999 22:50:56 GMT, "John Cromer" <cro@astro.caltech.edu> wrote: <quoted test snipped> (...) That was fun. And I just went to Dejanews to read the whole thread on David Roth. What a load of crap _that_ was. :-) -- Terry K -- (25 years ago, 16-Mar-99, to lugnet.general)
 
  Re: LEGO Purity test. was: Super Tanker and Tug Boat at Joe's Lego Page
 
(...) I've never taken one of these before, so I was wondering if you are more "Lego Pure" the lower the percentage. For reference, I got a 35% (If I did it correctly) Jeff (25 years ago, 16-Mar-99, to lugnet.general)
 
  Re: LEGO Purity test. was: Super Tanker and Tug Boat at Joe's Lego Page
 
(...) It was distressing, at the time. But it was much more lighthearted than the whole Mandroid thing. Or Minx's departure. In one way, it's funny to think a lot of people (myself included) were willing to believe that some kid built a 20-foot long (...) (25 years ago, 16-Mar-99, to lugnet.general)
 
  Re: LEGO Purity test. was: Super Tanker and Tug Boat at Joe's Lego Page
 
My favorite: (...) Steve (25 years ago, 16-Mar-99, to lugnet.general)
 
  Re: LEGO Purity test. was: Super Tanker and Tug Boat at Joe's Lego Page
 
Wow, what a bunch of skeletons in that closet. A very interesting read on both patron m. and patron r. -- I enjoy viewing a train accident as much as anyone else, I guess. It's funny that I always passed over those threads before. I do remember (...) (25 years ago, 16-Mar-99, to lugnet.general)
 
  Re: LEGO Purity test. was: Super Tanker and Tug Boat at Joe's Lego Page
 
(...) You may have made the same mistake I made - It says to total up the *no* answers and divide by 112. If you just kept track of the number you answered *yes*, then subtract that from 112 before you divide. I got a 48% pure. --Bram Bram Lambrecht (...) (25 years ago, 16-Mar-99, to lugnet.general)
 
  Re: LEGO Purity test. was: Super Tanker and Tug Boat at Joe's Lego Page
 
(...) I remember her too, but am vague on the departure. Maybe I missed that when I wasn't reading RTL for some time (still aren't), what happened? Keep Building!! -Tim <>< (URL) timcourtne ICQ: 23951114 New Lugnet Newsgroup? (...) (25 years ago, 17-Mar-99, to lugnet.general)
 
  Re: LEGO Purity test. was: Super Tanker and Tug Boat at Joe's Lego Page
 
(...) Sounds like I did it correctly, but I'm still wondering if a Lower percentage is more or less pure. :) Jeff (25 years ago, 17-Mar-99, to lugnet.general)

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR