 | | Re: FOTM/LOTM (Loss of the Month) Some thoughts... —Eric Joslin
|
| | | (...) Can I ask what this has to do with LEGO? FUT to lugnet.off-topic.debate, something you two should know by now to have done yourselves. eric (23 years ago, 11-Jul-01, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: FOTM/LOTM (Loss of the Month) Some thoughts... —Scott Arthur
|
| | | | | (...) Eric, I was in debate, but I moved it here as I understand that is where it belongs: (URL) If you had picked “apart the rest of the message instead of acting like some wisecrack”(1) perhaps you would have seen that. :-) Scott A (1) Using Peter (...) (23 years ago, 11-Jul-01, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: FOTM/LOTM (Loss of the Month) Some thoughts... —Kyle D. Jackson
|
| | | | | | (...) general parts stay in general ;] Read what I meant and not what I didn't write... :] KDJ ___...___ LUGNETer #203, Windsor, Ontario, Cananda (23 years ago, 12-Jul-01, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: FOTM/LOTM (Loss of the Month) Some thoughts... —Scott Arthur
|
| | | | | | (...) Yes. It may well be a debate, but it is not "off-topic" for LUGNET. I counted the word "LEGO" six times and AFOL once in the post. However, it may well be off topic for this group - I expect it belongs in .market.theory. If anyone ever answers (...) (23 years ago, 12-Jul-01, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: FOTM/LOTM (Loss of the Month) Some thoughts... —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | (...) <emphasis> (...) </emphasis> (...) You paint with too broad a brush, sir. And I resent it. I am very tired of it, in fact, in the general case. In this specific case I have repeatedly tried to move this thread to debate and others keep moving (...) (23 years ago, 11-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
