Subject:
|
Re: Another perspective on "legos"
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.general
|
Date:
|
Tue, 17 Apr 2001 15:12:47 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
439 times
|
| |
|
|
Ya, hey Timmy be careful with those bricks! You'll break a toe!
Or a parent not realizing what their kids are saying!
...OK....(nah could'nt be).....
(drop) BAM! OWWWW!!!! MA!!!! I droped a brick on my Toe!!!! I think it's
broken!!!
(I thought he ment his Lego)......
Now Timmy....you shouldn't be playing with these Bricks, they're heavy!
Go do somthing nice for 6 months like play with your Lego while your feet
heal. That's good Timmy.
In lugnet.general, Steve Bliss writes:
> While reading through various "It's LEGO, not legos" messages, an odd
> thought occurred to me:
>
> Practically speaking, which is more damaging to the LEGO Identity: kids
> saying things like "I'm gonna play with my lego(s)" or kids saying things
> like "I'm gonna play with my bricks"?
>
> Personally, if I was part of The LEGO Company, I'd rather hear the former
> than the latter. Especially if I was in Marketing or Brand Management.
>
> Steve
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Another perspective on "legos"
|
| While reading through various "It's LEGO, not legos" messages, an odd thought occurred to me: Practically speaking, which is more damaging to the LEGO Identity: kids saying things like "I'm gonna play with my lego(s)" or kids saying things like "I'm (...) (24 years ago, 17-Apr-01, to lugnet.general)
|
3 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
