 | | Re: April Fools posts —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | (...) IANTL (1) but I think the intent was that you were certifying that the info you gave on the posting form was true... not that you are promising that everything you ever say is true. After you fill in the info you also check the "I agree that i (...) (24 years ago, 4-Apr-01, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: April Fools posts —Bryan Kinkel
|
| | | | | Considering the looper we got last year (the fabulous "new" train line), I was looking forward to seeing what Ben had up his sleeves this year... "Larry Pieniazek" <lpieniazek@mercator.com> wrote in message news:GBAAty.D3@lugnet.com... <snipped> (...) (24 years ago, 4-Apr-01, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: April Fools posts —Frank Filz
|
| | | | | | (...) I think it would have been hard for him to pull something over on us like that twice in a row. Give it a year or two... Frank (24 years ago, 5-Apr-01, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: April Fools posts —Steve Bliss
|
| | | | | | (...) Ummm, isn't that just what he did? Pull off a major April Fool's prank two years in a row? No wonder he laid low this year. Steve (24 years ago, 5-Apr-01, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: April Fools posts —Scott Sanburn
|
| | | | | | To All, In regards to this, I would love to see these stupid April Fools items disappear ll together, but it isn't likely to happen. My rule now is to ignore any significant news for at least a month around April 1st, from March 15th to April 15th (...) (24 years ago, 5-Apr-01, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: April Fools posts —Ross Crawford
|
| | | | | (...) Indeed he was an instigator this year - (URL) (24 years ago, 4-Apr-01, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: April Fools posts — Todd Lehman
|
| | | | (...) Not at all. Correct. (24 years ago, 21-Apr-01, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | |
