Subject:
|
Re: Jack Stone Photos found (and Dinosaurs)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.year.2001, lugnet.general
|
Date:
|
Fri, 30 Mar 2001 19:17:16 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
85 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.year.2001, David Simmons writes:
> Erm. The Jack Stone sets look frighteningly pre-fab and the Dinosaurs look
> like they were made by someone else. Where are the bricks? Here's a couple
> of product lines that I won't mind NOT coming to the States.
Well they're coming, like it or not. For a better notion of the dino sets
take a look at this pic Christian Gemunden posted:
http://www.brickmaster.de/images/dino_6719-1.jpg
Focus on what can be done with the pieces that was not possible before.
These are not juniorized parts per se because they perform functions not
previously possible before and are not simply conglomerations of smaller
pieces. I don't expect the dinosaur sets to be liked by the majority of the
community but I do think they will surprise people by their flexibility.
I consider it like Star Wars Lego or Pirates- something I would have died
for as a kid.
Jack Stone however, IMO, is pretty awful. But I think the same thing of
Belville and Scala, lines that have proved their usefulness.
Jonathan
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | MUCH better!
|
| Well! I certainly hope the Jack Stone sets turn out to be as interesting as the Dinosaur stuff. That picture REALLY helps to make clear the possibilities of the Dinosaur line. Thanks Jonathan! Dave Jonathan Lill <jonathanl@myriadweb.com> wrote in (...) (24 years ago, 2-Apr-01, to lugnet.year.2001, lugnet.general)
|
Message is in Reply To:
6 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
