 | | Re: Does God have a name for God?
|
|
(...) Hey whatever blows yer hair back. Interpretation is really the mother of all invention, not necessity. (...) I find South Park's ability to make certain people get upset over trivial things to be quite humorous indeed. (...) Oh gee, what was I (...) (23 years ago, 30-Jan-01, to lugnet.general, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Does God have a name for God?
|
|
(...) Fair enough, but if you're going to accuse me of criticizing a view without knowing what that view is, you would be well-advised to make absolutely certain that I don't, otherwise you're just making another assumption (as if that comes as any (...) (23 years ago, 30-Jan-01, to lugnet.general, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Does God have a name for God?
|
|
(...) Perhaps, but is the thickness of his skin really something I should have to worry about in my day to day life? Robert (23 years ago, 30-Jan-01, to lugnet.general, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Does God have a name for God?
|
|
(...) Hmmm...sorry about that, I snipped it earlier and assumed it stayed snipped. I'll try to keep an eye on it and snip it when I reply if I see it. Robert (23 years ago, 30-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Does God have a name for God?
|
|
(...) Uh yeah, I think we got it, the threads are so big though that a couple offshoots got missed. Just chill d00d, I'm sure general isn't being completely overwhelmed in posts, it'll all clear up in a day or so. Robert (23 years ago, 30-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Does God have a name for God?
|
|
(...) More specifically, I have understood it to mean that man has the capacity for Grace, and in this way we are created in His image. (...) Well, if you thought South Park was humorous, then you have issues that won't be resolved in this forum. (...) (23 years ago, 30-Mar-01, to lugnet.general, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Does God have a name for God?
|
|
In lugnet.general, Dave Schuler writes: I apologize for inadvertantly posting the debate in the .general group. I thought the debate had already been moved to OT.debate. Sorry about that. Dave! (23 years ago, 30-Mar-01, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Does God have a name for God?
|
|
Gentlemen, (23 years ago, 30-Mar-01, to lugnet.general, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Does God have a name for God?
|
|
Folks, Is there some compelling reason that this is still in general, after repeated plea's? This is just plain rude, and I do not want to see it. I would go to debate to see it. Please stop. FUT->off.topic.debate Scott S. -- (23 years ago, 30-Mar-01, to lugnet.general, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Does God have a name for God?
|
|
(...) Fair enough, but if you're going to criticize a view, you would be well-advised to learn what that view is. (...) You're committing a basic falacy of reason, in that you are assuming that, since some of their views were incorrect, *all* were (...) (23 years ago, 30-Mar-01, to lugnet.general, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Does God have a name for God?
|
|
(...) Robert, in written language, sarcasm can be misinterpreted as personal angry attacks. That's why Dave said what he did about castigating Aaron. --Ryan (23 years ago, 30-Mar-01, to lugnet.general, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Does God have a name for God?
|
|
(...) Scott do it like this... Jude (23 years ago, 30-Mar-01, to lugnet.general, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Does God have a name for God?
|
|
(...) GUYS! To re-iterate (albiet more rudely) what at least a couple people have said: Get this crap out of lugnet.general! James (23 years ago, 30-Mar-01, to lugnet.general, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
