| | Re: Question to Collectors Steve Bliss
|
| | And the allocation of parts-into-baggies is just fascinating on this set. Steve (...) (26 years ago, 23-Feb-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| | |
| | | | Re: Question to Collectors Tom Stangl
|
| | | | What it is is ANNOYING. I'm going to have to build one complete set, then tear all the subsets down, make an inventory, then open the other 9+ to sort them into the subsets. NO WAY am I building 10 of everything. (...) (26 years ago, 24-Feb-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Question to Collectors Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | (...) You'd rather they juniorized it with a set bag with picture per set??? Bendyarm did an inventory... let me root and get back to you, after I check with him to see if he's OK with sharing it. (26 years ago, 24-Feb-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Question to Collectors Steve Bliss
|
| | | | | Don't get me wrong -- I'm glad they didn't do a Town, Jr. sort on it (which would have helped you out). But usually the parts are sorted into baggies a bit more logically, by size. I can imagine these things required an inefficient setup in the (...) (26 years ago, 24-Feb-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Question to Collectors Steve Bliss
|
| | | | Thinking about your dilemma, you could[1] grab all ten copies of a single bag, and sort out the pieces from that bag. Repeat for all bags. Then build one model to discover the required pieces, and collect 10x from each pile. BTW, I may be having an (...) (26 years ago, 24-Feb-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | |