 | | Re: LEGO Company announces poor performance in year 2000 —Richard Marchetti
| | | | (...) the planet (I suppose that this assumes that none or destroyed, thrown away, etc). I further suppose that this is the fact upon which another claim is based -- the claim that market saturation is problem for TLC. You can't build much with 52 (...) (24 years ago, 5-Mar-01, to lugnet.general)
| | | | | | | | | | Re: LEGO Company announces poor performance in year 2000 —Chris Leach
| | | | | (...) Hmmmm how about 25th anniversary copys of "Classic"sets from that corresponding year? Sets from 1977 for 2002 ,1978 for 2003 etc... (24 years ago, 5-Mar-01, to lugnet.general)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: LEGO Company announces poor performance in year 2000 —Scott Sanburn
| | | | | | Chris & All, (...) Heh heh, I can't wait for when Futuron came out then, and Blacktron 1, and some other cheaper sets with garage doors, monorail accessory packs, etc. : ) (I think my bank account could wait, though!) Scott S. -- (24 years ago, 5-Mar-01, to lugnet.general)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | Re: LEGO Company announces poor performance in year 2000 —Lars Brandt
| | | | | (...) That's absolutely silly. How do you intend to keep losing money year after year if you give the faithful, returning customer something of value that would generate sales. You can't do that. Bionicles: that's how you lose money. Sheesh, you're (...) (24 years ago, 7-Mar-01, to lugnet.general)
| | | | | | |
