 | | Re: LEGO Company announces poor performance in year 2000 —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | (...) Rock Raiders, yes, I think so... 1999 sets. Arctic and Knights Kingdom?? I'm not sure about that, aren't they 2000 sets? So they're not quite at end of life yet. Note that, IIRC, the Spring catalog traditionally has been the "lightest" and (...) (24 years ago, 1-Mar-01, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: LEGO Company announces poor performance in year 2000 —Scott Sanburn
|
| | | | | (...) Yes, RR are gone, the others no. Those are 2000. So I missed a year. : ) Scott S. -- (24 years ago, 1-Mar-01, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: LEGO Company announces poor performance in year 2000 —Eric Kingsley
|
| | | | | (...) I'm theorizing here but I think they are possibly trying to scale down the catalogs because of the emergence of shop.lego.com. Even the themes that do appear in the catalog many of them are incomplete and have a "Look for more XXX-theme (...) (24 years ago, 1-Mar-01, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: LEGO Company announces poor performance in year 2000 —Suzanne D. Rich
|
| | | | | | | (...) -Suz (24 years ago, 1-Mar-01, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: LEGO Company announces poor performance in year 2000 —Tim Courtney
|
| | | | | | | "Eric Kingsley" <kingsley@nelug.org> wrote in message news:G9JEzM.AHB@lugnet.com... (...) ^^^ I would sure hope not... ;-) -Tim (24 years ago, 1-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: LEGO Company announces poor performance in year 2000 —Matt Brooks
|
| | | | | | | | (...) Were these lines involved with Anime in any way??? Matt (24 years ago, 2-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: LEGO Company announces poor performance in year 2000 —Tim Courtney
|
| | | | | | | | "Matt Brooks" <mbrooks@sonic.net> wrote in message news:3A9FCDE1.BB2B52...nic.net... (...) ROFL!! Jeff, any comment? -Tim (24 years ago, 2-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: LEGO Company announces poor performance in year 2000 —Tony Hafner
|
| | | | | | (...) Ugh- at least you can turn a physical page in less than 2 minutes. -- Tony Hafner www.hafhead.com (24 years ago, 2-Mar-01, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: LEGO Company announces poor performance in year 2000 —Anders Isaksson
|
| | | | "Larry Pieniazek" <lpieniazek@mercator.com> skrev i meddelandet news:G9JE9r.8LM@lugnet.com... (...) Speaking of 'light' catalogs, my reaction to the Swedish 2001 catalog was: "The heaviest I ever seen (when put on a scale), but not so much Lego (...) (24 years ago, 2-Mar-01, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: LEGO Company announces poor performance in year 2000 —Benjamin Medinets
|
| | | | (...) And I just want to add I like none of the new stuff at all... I don't like any of the studio line - way, WAY overpriced racers or race, bionicle, 95% of the life on mars - most of the sets were probably designed by people in a loony bin (...) (24 years ago, 3-Mar-01, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | |
