Subject:
|
Re: Huge lots?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.general
|
Date:
|
Fri, 9 Feb 2001 20:54:07 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1252 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.general, Wayne R. Hussey writes:
>
> I think the word "huge" is a very relative term when applied to eBay. I have
> been searching lots for quite a while now, and have often been brought up
> short with the "huge lot of pieces" finding the lot has 15 pieces. Here are
> some 'daffynitions' for terms used by sellers - I'm sure more can be added ;-).
>
> Huge - all that could be found
> Rare - found only one
> Old - forgot where it came from
> Vintage - anything from the 90's back (starting at '99)
> Tons - at least a pound
> Bulk - more than 6
> Too many to count - more than 101
> MIB - the box was found
> Unopened MISB - can you say 'redundant'
> Complete - according to the instructions found on Brickshelf (which aren't
> included, neither are the stickers)
> LEGO - anything resembling however remotely, and sometimes not even
> remotely, the best building toy in the world - I'm constantly amazed at just
> how much stuff LEGO has produced ;-).
>
> Wayne
You forgot
"It looks complete."-I dumped out the pieces and there are a bunch, they all
look like whatever is in the picture on the instructions.
At flea markets I get a lot of "It's from the 70's!" when I look at some
stuff. Yup, I wore courderoy flair bell bottoms once, not gonna do it again.
(junior)
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Huge lots?
|
| (...) I think the word "huge" is a very relative term when applied to eBay. I have been searching lots for quite a while now, and have often been brought up short with the "huge lot of pieces" finding the lot has 15 pieces. Here are some (...) (26 years ago, 9-Feb-01, to lugnet.general)
|
14 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
