 | | Re: TLG investigation 1st answers —Jim Wissner
|
| | | (...) enemies (...) Of course I don't expect that. I stated "bitterness in tone". What I meant was that some of this frustration with TLG, much of which - please make no mistake - is clearly justified, could come across better if it were phrased in (...) (26 years ago, 19-Feb-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: TLG investigation 1st answers —Mike Stanley
|
| | | | (...) Well, whether we come across as all sweetness and nice or as a bunch of crazed lunatics, the pessimist in me thinks it will have the same effect - little to none. In fact, I'm so confident in my pessimism that I'd be willing to bet a dozen (...) (26 years ago, 20-Feb-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: TLG investigation 1st answers —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | No bet unless you're offering odds. I'd take it at 12 to 1, though. (...) (26 years ago, 22-Feb-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: TLG investigation 1st answers —Mike Stanley
|
| | | | (...) Well, I might put up 12 to your 1 but I couldn't put up 144 to your 12. Well, I could, but that would leave me with too few on the off chance that I lost, which I wouldn't, but still. (26 years ago, 23-Feb-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: TLG investigation 1st answers —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | (...) I don't have 12 myself so that's what I meant... It would just be an ordinary silver one, though, not the special silver that John Neal gave me, that came in a jewelry case. (...) (26 years ago, 23-Feb-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | |
