 | | Re: LEGO Barcodes have changed!! :-( —Steve Scott
|
| | | Could be a strong case here for Lugnet.barcode.boffins :) Cheers [SteveScott] Carbon 60 wrote in message <36C6E275.48D558FF@b...ot.com>... (...) (26 years ago, 14-Feb-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: LEGO Barcodes have changed!! :-( —Steve Scott
|
| | | | Oops, how did that end up over here, should have gone to Lugnet.announce. .....Duh [SteveScott] (26 years ago, 14-Feb-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: LEGO Barcodes have changed!! :-( —Todd Lehman
|
| | | | (...) =:^o Nope, your reply absolutely positively should not have gone to lugnet.announce. Your post wound up over here because Simon set the Followup-To field of his article to lugnet.general. Note that lugnet.announce is a group for making (...) (26 years ago, 15-Feb-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | |
