 | | (canceled) —Gerry Venteicher
| | | | | | | | | | (canceled) —Stefan Eilert
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | Re: 2001 Set info —Shiri Dori
| | | | | | | (...) <snip> (...) Let me go one step further... in fact, I just had this conversation with a camp-fella who was checking out my site and asked if I try to make it look as realistic as possible, or to maintain the lego feel... and I answered that, (...) (24 years ago, 6-Aug-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.starwars)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Re: 2001 Set info —Karim Nassar
| | | | | | | (...) Too true, and I fully agree, but the difference here is that they are fulfilling a license of existing models, and if they choose to call a set an Star Wars A-wing fighter, it should at least be the right shape & colors. Don't get me wrong... (...) (24 years ago, 6-Aug-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.starwars)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | Re: 2001 Set info —Mark Sandlin
| | | | | Well, here we go again. I've never complained about scale. I understand that the proportions of the minifig make this kind of a moot point. The XWing, Snowspeeder, TIE, Y-wing, Speeder Bikes, etc. were all good sets. I think Lego did an excellent (...) (24 years ago, 7-Aug-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.starwars)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: 2001 Set info —Stefan Eilert
| | | | | Hi! Mark Sandlin schrieb: (...) Okay, the 'scale' issue wasn't appropiate at this point, but there were so many posts about it in the last few month that I couldn't resist to mention it :-) (...) The MF is much too expensive for sure. I hope they (...) (24 years ago, 8-Aug-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.starwars)
| | | | | | |
