 | | Re: New website layout, what you think? —Patrick Justison
| | | | Thanks for responding Jeremy. This is just a draft, or a sketch of the final layout. There will be text to help guide you to the various sub-pages that will appear under the large images. I'll also list some hard link text below so that those too (...) (24 years ago, 13-Jul-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.publish)
| | | | | | | | | | Re: New website layout, what you think? —Jeremy H. Sproat
| | | | | (...) Cool! (...) Well to be honest, I'm running through a T1 line, so I'm not an effective judge of download times. Perhaps when I get my 33.6 hooked up at home again... Personally, I don't mind waiting for a 83K page over the modem. (In fact, I (...) (24 years ago, 13-Jul-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.publish)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: New website layout, what you think? —Patrick Justison
| | | | | comments below (...) I'd be interested in knowing this. I'm happy with anything that is 100kb or less. But I'm an ex-cable modem and new dsl person, so I'd like to hear from the normal modem users. (...) I agree here, with a fast connect/reconnect (...) (24 years ago, 13-Jul-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.publish)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: New website layout, what you think? —Jeremy H. Sproat
| | | | | (...) I'm not entirely sure, though I suspect that PPP or SLIP are not optimized for a protocol like HTTP which makes many new socket connections in a short period of time. I have discovered that telnet and even FTP performace is much better than (...) (24 years ago, 13-Jul-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.publish)
| | | | | | |
