 | | Re: Lego(r) Master Maniac designation? —Stephen Jacquot
|
| | | (...) I won't speak for Larry (whose idea this was in the first place), but that's certainly nothing like anything I ever had in mind, and if that's what this thing degenerates into, I'll call it a failure and move on. Do you believe that the (...) (26 years ago, 30-Dec-98, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Lego(r) Master Maniac designation? —James Brown
|
| | | | | (...) (26 years ago, 30-Dec-98, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Lego(r) Master Maniac designation? —James Brown
|
| | | | | (...) I'm involved (running, actually) a local 'social club' based around a completely different hobby, but the basics are the same, regardless of where the special interest lies. The biggest single thing that a group can do to avoid the 'elitism' (...) (26 years ago, 30-Dec-98, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Lego(r) Master Maniac designation? —Stephen Jacquot
|
| | | | | | (...) Although I could be dissuaded, I would prefer that the membership not be open absolutely, but that there be some minimal qualification that practically anyone could meet with some minor effort, perhaps any one item from an expanded version of (...) (26 years ago, 1-Jan-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Lego(r) Master Maniac designation? —Matthew Verdier
|
| | | | Steve Jacquot wrote in message <368A4443.41C6@kali....ia.edu>... (...) dole (...) interpersonal (...) what. (...) I tend to be cynical, and distrust organizations in general. A random sampling of webpages that focus on hobbies has led me to believe (...) (26 years ago, 30-Dec-98, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Lego(r) Master Maniac designation? —Stephen Jacquot
|
| | | | Matthew Verdier wrote: r (...) For what it's worth, this is pretty much exactly what I had in mind (still not speaking for Larry). (...) I agree absolutely with respect to the merit awards. With respect to the service award, I can't say that (...) (26 years ago, 31-Dec-98, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Lego(r) Master Maniac designation? —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | (...) You're carrying on just fine. If this nascent idea cannot be implemented except as a popularity contest, I would oppose it. NMRA models are judged without names attached, and many of the MM criteria the NMRA put in place are at least partly (...) (26 years ago, 30-Dec-98, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | |
