 | | Re: Lego(r) Master Maniac designation? —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | (...) No, I don't. I agree with you that it should not be merit badge-ish. I tried to address this by a) offering alternatives: N pages OR CLSotW. You can win CLSotW with just one page if it's cool enough. (consider the CNC machine. That site was (...) (26 years ago, 27-Dec-98, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Lego(r) Master Maniac designation? —Stephen Jacquot
|
| | | | (...) Point taken, although I see nothing wrong with limiting it just to CLSotW winners, particularly since (with the 3/4 rule) that wouldn't even be a necessary qualification. But allowing the N page alternative, as if that were in some way (...) (26 years ago, 28-Dec-98, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Lego(r) Master Maniac designation? —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | (...) I think you're on to something here. Honors for service, honors for body of work. Separate things. I dug up the NMRA reference: (URL) describes the Achievement Program, as well as the Master Model Railroader designation. Interesting reading. (...) (26 years ago, 28-Dec-98, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Lego(r) Master Maniac designation? —Stephen Jacquot
|
| | | | (...) The more I think about this, the more appropriate it seems. At this entry level, the objective is primarily to encourage activity, not to reward achievement, so why not let it be merit badgy? Most of the web sites people create specifically to (...) (26 years ago, 28-Dec-98, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | |
