 | | Re: Plagiarism again (Was: Can we say, "Plagiarism"?) —Susan Hoover
|
| | | (...) Here is the letter that I received in full: "Hello, Thank you for the e-mail! Someone else has written in about this so called Winner in November. We will have to see what happens. Best regards" The letter that I sent was much longer. (...) I (...) (24 years ago, 26-Jan-00, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Plagiarism again (Was: Can we say, "Plagiarism"?) —Frank Filz
|
| | | | Susan Hoover wrote in message <8EC773C68rumplestx@...63.236>... (...) That's a pretty limp letter from a corporation which is currently violating a copy right. They also should have been able to investigate the claim and have already removed the (...) (24 years ago, 26-Jan-00, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Plagiarism again (Was: Can we say, "Plagiarism"?) —Doug Dropeskey
|
| | | | | Frank Filz <ffilz@mindspring.com> wrote in message news:FoyLt9.9y8@lugnet.com... (...) violating (...) The reply I received (which I passed on to Susan) was very similar and equally compact but a bit more positive. At least someone has acknowedged (...) (24 years ago, 27-Jan-00, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Plagiarism again (Was: Can we say, "Plagiarism"?) —Dave Schuler
|
| | | | (...) Agreed--especially considering the zeal with which they protect their own "intellectual properties." Dave! (24 years ago, 27-Jan-00, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | |
