 | | Re: Plagiarism again (Was: Can we say, "Plagiarism"?)
|
|
(...) Here is the letter that I received in full: "Hello, Thank you for the e-mail! Someone else has written in about this so called Winner in November. We will have to see what happens. Best regards" The letter that I sent was much longer. (...) I (...) (25 years ago, 26-Jan-00, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Plagiarism again (Was: Can we say, "Plagiarism"?)
|
|
Susan Hoover wrote in message <8EC773C68rumplestx@...63.236>... (...) That's a pretty limp letter from a corporation which is currently violating a copy right. They also should have been able to investigate the claim and have already removed the (...) (25 years ago, 26-Jan-00, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Plagiarism again (Was: Can we say, "Plagiarism"?)
|
|
Frank Filz <ffilz@mindspring.com> wrote in message news:FoyLt9.9y8@lugnet.com... (...) violating (...) The reply I received (which I passed on to Susan) was very similar and equally compact but a bit more positive. At least someone has acknowedged (...) (25 years ago, 27-Jan-00, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Plagiarism again (Was: Can we say, "Plagiarism"?)
|
|
(...) Agreed--especially considering the zeal with which they protect their own "intellectual properties." Dave! (25 years ago, 27-Jan-00, to lugnet.general)
|
