 | | Who documents rtl? (Was: Who oversees the rec.toys.LEGO newsgroup?)
|
|
(...) Man, now I gotta go back into deja.com and see how stupid someone had to be to completely alienate someone as smart and creative as Gary. Which leads me to wonder... As alt.forlklore.urban and some other usenet groups had people taking notes (...) (24 years ago, 24-Jan-00, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Mad Hatter and RTL (Was Re: Who documents rtl?)
|
|
Sproaticus wrote in message <388C8BED.3BCCF9F@io.com>... (...) final (...) to (...) Definitely, go to Deja-News and read the Mad Hatter thread. The poster known as "Mad Hatter" was not stupid. Egotistical, certainly. Immature, without doubt. Rude, (...) (24 years ago, 29-Jan-00, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Mad Hatter and RTL (Was Re: Who documents rtl?)
|
|
(...) Well, um, uh, gee, thanks Paul. The Mad Hatter was actually not the only reason I left RTL. Time was another consideration. I just didn't have enough time to do both RTL and LUGNET justice. I really did see the good in Mr. Hatter. I saw (...) (24 years ago, 31-Jan-00, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Mad Hatter and RTL (Was Re: Who documents rtl?)
|
|
In lugnet.general, Paul Baulch wrote: [snipped interesting analysis and color commentary of Mad Hatter bruhaha] I must have missed parts/most of the Mad Hatter thing. I don't think I did, but I must have. I feel the Mandroid mess was way worse than (...) (24 years ago, 31-Jan-00, to lugnet.general)
|
