 | | Re: Who oversees the rec.toys.LEGO newsgroup? —Eric Kingsley
|
| | | (...) Well I really don't think this post needs a reply and I have instituted my own rule about not posting flames in response to ignorant posts, so I won't but this seems as good a place as any for me to post about how I feel on the matter. 1. As (...) (25 years ago, 24-Jan-00, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Who oversees the rec.toys.LEGO newsgroup? —James Wilson
|
| | | | | (...) the (...) with (...) few (...) is (...) and (...) (25 years ago, 24-Jan-00, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Who oversees the rec.toys.LEGO newsgroup? —Peter Callaway
|
| | | | (...) You certainly are more optimistic than me. I think respect is something that has to be earned, either by actions or attitude or both. In my industry, and even within my company I come across a lot of people who are less than competent to (...) (25 years ago, 25-Jan-00, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Who oversees the rec.toys.LEGO newsgroup? —Lindsay Frederick Braun
|
| | | | Hello, (...) Respect as an abstraction isn't variable for me; what I respect about another is. Note that Todd himself hasn't fallen back on that "because I said so" argument--and when we had the leaked-scans issue, he was very quick to give (...) (25 years ago, 25-Jan-00, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Who oversees the rec.toys.LEGO newsgroup? —Peter Callaway
|
| | | | Lindsay, I think we are talking semantics here, and I can mostly be blamed for the confusion due to my less than accademic-standard grasp of the written and spoken word. (...) True, and that is one of the reasons why I accord him with a great deal (...) (25 years ago, 31-Jan-00, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | |
