 | | Re: The realization of juniorization sets in... —Paul Davidson
|
| | | True, it would have been an expensive set otherwise, but here's what I first saw when I looked at the box: Several large road pieces with no studs. Large one-piece road support POOPs. An enormous 1-piece crane support POOP. A large 1-piece (...) (25 years ago, 30-Dec-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: The realization of juniorization sets in... —Frank Filz
|
| | | | Paul Davidson wrote in message ... (...) first (...) These do actually have some studs, though it would perhaps have been nice if they had studs along the whole length of the wall (though said studs would be weird, and not necessarily usefull on (...) (25 years ago, 31-Dec-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: The realization of juniorization sets in... —Tony Priestman
|
| | | | | On Fri, 31 Dec 1999, Frank Filz (<FnL5Ar.4q6@lugnet.com>) wrote at 03:20:12 (...) Let's not go there :-) (25 years ago, 31-Dec-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: The realization of juniorization sets in... —Oliver Giesen
|
| | | | <SNIP> (...) of (...) Another (...) I would like to have seen this piece (and the Mixer) made from several sections, so that it could be expanded or compressed to make different size models. ( Like in the good old days on the 378 (farm tractor and (...) (25 years ago, 31-Dec-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | |
