 | | Re: CLSOTW voting —Dan Jezek
|
| | | (...) there (...) I don't understand a word of that you just described above. For example there are sites A, B, C and D that people can vote on with radio buttons next to them. By the end of the week, Joe builds this very cool castle and 20 people (...) (25 years ago, 19-Dec-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: CLSOTW voting —Todd Lehman
|
| | | | (...) This may be clearer: (URL) [snip description of enhanced voting mechanism] A better voting mechanism will be feasable later when voting is more secure (via member sign-in, and after there are at least ~500 members or so), but for now it's (...) (25 years ago, 19-Dec-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: CLSOTW voting —Dan Jezek
|
| | | | (...) I see. Right now a person can submit multiple votes from a single IP. A not very effective solution would be to place a cookie on the client's PC after which they voted once for a specific week they couldn't vote again. This would eliminate (...) (25 years ago, 20-Dec-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: CLSOTW voting —Huw Millington
|
| | | | D. Jezek <danjezek@REMOVEaloha.net> wrote in message news:Fn0J0G.MvJ@lugnet.com... (...) wasn't (...) one (...) the (...) Thanks Dan. Not the most complete, but its quality over quantity. I think I know what stuffing is, and needless to say, I (...) (25 years ago, 20-Dec-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | |
