Subject:
|
Re: Pastel = Profit (Was Re: 2000 Dealer catalogue Removal Request Backfire?)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.general
|
Date:
|
Fri, 17 Dec 1999 21:16:33 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
91 times
|
| |
|
|
Yep, and I'll respect that statement. But I certainly WON'T agree with it.
Putting pics on an open website and then saying "hey don't look at those" is NOT
the way to run a website. Don't put them there in the first place, if you don't
want them viewed.
Todd Lehman wrote:
> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Tom Stangl writes:
> > Richard Franks wrote:
> > > In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Tom Stangl writes:
> > > > Yes, and until I see otherwise from TLC, I consider the "illegal 2000
> > > > scans" to be "restrained and respectful use". I really DO want to hear
> > > > from TLCabout it, one way or the other.
> > >
> > > What do you think they will say, bearing in mind that these are secret,
> > > not for public use documents?
> >
> > Oh? - PROVE IT! Quit shoving it down our throats as gospel, and PROVE IT.
> > SHOW us the documents proving these are "secret". Are they limited
> > production/circulation? Yes. Secret? PROVE IT.
>
> LEGO made an official statement today:
>
> http://www.lugnet.com/announce/?n=415
>
> --Todd
--
Tom Stangl
***http://www.vfaq.com/
***DSM Visual FAQ home
***http://ba.dsm.org/
***SF Bay Area DSMs
|
|
Message has 3 Replies:
Message is in Reply To:
116 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
