Subject:
|
Re: Pastel = Profit (Was Re: 2000 Dealer catalogue Removal Request Backfire?)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.general
|
Date:
|
Fri, 17 Dec 1999 20:01:45 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2313 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Tom Stangl writes:
> Richard Franks wrote:
> > In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Tom Stangl writes:
> > > Yes, and until I see otherwise from TLC, I consider the "illegal 2000
> > > scans" to be "restrained and respectful use". I really DO want to hear
> > > from TLCabout it, one way or the other.
> >
> > What do you think they will say, bearing in mind that these are secret,
> > not for public use documents?
>
> Oh? - PROVE IT! Quit shoving it down our throats as gospel, and PROVE IT.
> SHOW us the documents proving these are "secret". Are they limited
> production/circulation? Yes. Secret? PROVE IT.
LEGO made an official statement today:
http://www.lugnet.com/announce/?n=415
--Todd
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
116 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
