| |
In lugnet.dear-lego, Shiri Dori writes:
> In lugnet.dear-lego, Jeff Thompson writes:
> > Oddly enough, that's what LEGO has already done with the 2000
> > castle sets, dividing the line into the warlike faction and the
> > romantic knights faction. But they could do so further without
> > cheeseballing it up so much that a little boy wouldn't want to
> > play with it.
>
> I'm not really sure what you mean - Belville and Knights, or Knights and Cow-
> men?
The knights vs the moo-men.
The knights come with a king, a princess, and a warrior babe, steps to
make the sets girl-friendly?
The moo-men are much more boyish, testosterone-poisoned sets.
>
> I agree...
>
> -Shiri
>
> (1) How 'bout a removable horn for the unicorn?
Right! A horse with a hole in his head for a horn element.
And a saddle with horizontal clips to hold feathered pegasus
wings.
--
jthompson@esker.com "Float on a river, forever and ever, Emily"
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Horrible quote from the Scala web catalog
|
| (...) I *so* agree. I, as a "girl", like the royal family, pegsasii (plural pegasus, right?), and unicorns (1), and would enjoy stuff like that in LEGO. I also like soldiers and guards, and would enjoy seeing a feudal system line of castles, with (...) (27 years ago, 13-Dec-99, to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.scala, lugnet.general)
|
28 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
